There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
In May 2018, a class-action lawsuit was filed against the sellers of a Medicare supplement program called My Senior Healthcare Partners for allegedly falsely representing to the elderly that the program provides air ambulance transportation from the Medical Air Services Association (MASA) and that policy holders can name a beneficiary to inherit the benefits when, according to the plaintiffs, the program does not include any MASA benefits and the benefits are not capable of being inherited. (Ziegler et al v. Dale; Senior Healthcare Partners, LLC; Buffett Senior Healthcare Corp.; RJR Insurance Services, Inc., Case No. 18-cv-71, D. Wy.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of misleadingly marketing that targets seniors, click here.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
Recent ad shows what it takes to make a comeback.
New research points to “no.”