There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Andersen et al. v. Mid-America Pet Food, LLC
23-cv-140, E.D. Tex.
(Nov. 2023)
Victor Super Premium, Wayne Feeds, Eagle Mountain, and Member’s Mark pet foods
Falsely marketing pet foods as healthy, nutritious, and suitable for animals when they were contaminated with salmonella
Pending
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.