‘Bet Now’: How Wagering Apps’ Push Notification Ads Bombard Consumers
TINA.org joins petition urging FTC to require consent and opt-out for gambling marketing.
Joybird
Case Name (Date)
Jacobs et al. v. La-Z-Boy Inc.
24-cv-4446, C.D. Cal.
(May 2024)
Jacobs et al. v. La-Z-Boy Inc. and Stitch Industries, Inc.
25CU038051N, California state court – San Diego
(July 2025)
Product/Service
Joybird furniture and home décor
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing discounts off of artificially inflated “original” prices
Status
Case No. 24-cv-4446: Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Case No. 25CU038051N): Settled
(Preliminarily approved)
https://joybirdsettlement.com/
The Latest
Does Gatorade ‘Hydrate Better than Water’?
Lawsuits takes aim at sports drinks’ superior hydration claim.
Phoebe Gates’s Startup Phia Was Just Accused of ‘Cookie Stuffing.’ Here’s What Happens Next
Esther Lian, Inc.com
Airport Retailers Can Now Charge an Employee Benefits Fee—but It May Not Go to Workers
Georgia Fearn, Inc.com
CATrends: False HEPA Claims
Lawsuits attempt to clear the air.