Joe’s Jeans
July 2017: A state court judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement.
March 2017: A state court judge preliminarily approved a settlement of this action. The settlement, which was amended in November 2016 and February 2017, also resolves two related lawsuits:
- Noiman v. Hudson Clothing, LLC, Case No. 37-2015-566, San Diego Superior Court
- Schulert v. Hudson Clothing, LLC, Case No. 15-cv-276, D. ME.
According to the settlement terms, class members may receive one tote bag worth $55 or one t-shirt worth $68 for each product purchased. In addition, the company agreed to comply laws that govern Made in USA marketing. A final approval hearing is scheduled for July 28, 2017. For more information, go to http://www.joesjeanssettlement.com/.
March 2016: An amended complaint making the same claims was filed.
July 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Joe’s Jeans for allegedly labelling jeans as being “Made in USA” when, according to plaintiffs, they contain foreign-made parts. (Card et al v. Joe’s Jeans, Inc. and Does 1-100, Case No. 37-2015-00021834, California Superior Court – County of San Diego)
For more information about Made in the USA claims, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
The Latest
Factor: 50% Off Your First Box
Unboxing this meal kit company’s enticing offer.
Perimenopause is the new buzzword in the business of women’s health
Sarah Todd, Stat News
Will Walmart Ever Take Responsibility for Deception on Its Site?
TINA.org finds more of the same – and then some – from retail giant.
Amazon to Pay $2.5 Billion to Settle Trickery Charges Related to Prime
FTC lawsuit alleged company duped consumers into signing up and then made it hard to cancel.
Memory Defender
Your best defense against deceptive AI? A little research.