
Huggies Simply Clean Fragrance Free Baby Wipes
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as clean, gentle, safe, hypoallergenic, and plant-based
April 2015: The named plaintiff voluntarily dismissed her claims When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
July 2013: Consumers filed a class-action lawsuit against the makers and marketers of Huggies baby products for deceptive advertising. Specifically, the plaintiffs allege that Huggies “pure & natural” Diapers and Huggies “Natural Care” Wipes are marketed as natural, pure, environmentally sound, and safe, organic alternatives to traditional diapers and wipes when, in reality, the products contain unnatural and potentially toxic ingredients. (Jou et al. v. Kimberly-Clark Corp. et al., Case No. 13-cv-03075, N.D. CA.).
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as clean, gentle, safe, hypoallergenic, and plant-based
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain or are at risk of containing harmful per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)
Allegations: Deceptively marketing diapers as safe when they contain a skin irritant
Allegations: Falsely marketing wipes as “plant-based”
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising diapers as safe and gentle without disclosing that they may cause rashes, blistering, peeling, and chemical burns
A deceptive marketing trend takes root.
How negative feelings surrounding menstruation have influenced period product marketing.
Five class-action settlements that left consumers behind in 2022.
NAD recommends changes after Pampers makes a stink over competing diaper brand’s ad claims.
You can’t always *depend* on the picture on the packaging.