
Ancestry.com
TINA.org uncovers questionable roots behind this “free” offer.
In September 2014, a federal judge approved a $5 million settlement of three consolidated false advertising class-action lawsuits against Hewlett-Packard Company (HP). The complaints, which were filed between 2005 and 2007, alleged that HP misrepresented facts about its ink cartridges and printers. For example, the complaint alleged that HP misleadingly claimed that the “smart chip” embedded in its printer cartridges improved a printer’s performance by signaling when an ink cartridge needed to be replaced when, in reality, the chip was programmed to indicate that ink needed to be replaced before the cartridge was empty.
According to the settlement terms, class members are eligible to receive coupons in the following amounts:
In addition, HP agreed to make changes to its marketing materials, such as explaining on its website that the “low on ink” messages are based on “estimated ink levels” and “actual ink levels may vary.”
(In Re HP Inkjet Printer Litigation, Case No. 05-cv-03580, N. D. CA.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Hewlett-Packard and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
TINA.org uncovers questionable roots behind this “free” offer.
These claims to detect intolerances to more than 200 foods are tough to stomach.
Lawsuits challenge American-made claims.
TINA.org takes a bite out of company’s research.
Don’t let this vacation ad trip you up.