Honest Plant-Based Wipes
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as “plant-based” when they contain ingredients that do not come from plants
January 2018: An objector filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the final approval of the settlement. Later in January, the appeal was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which were not disclosed.
December 2017: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement.
July 2017: A federal judge granted preliminary approval of the settlement. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for December 8, 2017. For more information, go to https://www.thcmarketingsettlementclaim.com/.
June 2017: Plaintiffs moved for preliminary approval of a settlement of this lawsuit. According to the proposed settlement terms, class members may receive $2.50 in cash or credit for each product purchased (class members without proof of purchase are limited to 10 refunds). In addition, the company agreed to make certain labeling changes (e.g., not using the terms “all natural” or “100% natural” on any labels, not using the phrase “no harsh chemicals, ever!” on products that contain certain ingredients, and defining certain terms, such as “natural,” “naturally derived,” “plant-based,” and “plant-derived,” when they are used on product labels. (In Re: Honest Marketing Litigation, Case No. 16-cv-1125, S. D. NY.)
February 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against The Honest Company for allegedly deceptively marketing personal, baby, and household care products as natural, “plant-based,” and containing “no harsh chemicals, ever” when, according to plaintiffs, the products contain synthetic and toxic ingredients. (Buonasera et al v. The Honest Company, Inc., Case No. 16-cv-1125, S. D. NY.)
For more information about natural claims and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against The Honest Company and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as “plant-based” when they contain ingredients that do not come from plants
In January 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against The Coca-Cola Company for allegedly misleadingly marketing its Honest Organic Peach Tea as being “Just a Tad Sweet” to imply that…
February 2018: This action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.. December 2017: The parties notified the Court that the settlement agreement in…
February 2018: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed. December 2017: The parties…
December 2017: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement. August 2017: A federal judge granted preliminary approval of the settlement agreement. A final fairness hearing is scheduled…
May 2016: This action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed. November 2013: A class-action…
May 2017: This action was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed. The named plaintiff’s claims were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot…
With spring in the air, keep your expectations surrounding these claims grounded.
With Earth Day right around the corner, here’s a handful of items whose earthy claims have been challenged.
Don’t get burned by these sunscreen claims.
Oh, the irony behind these five brand names.
Company’s “free” trial for diapers and wipes could end up costing you big if you miss the terms.