
TikTok’s CEO faces bipartisan skepticism in first Congressional hearing on security concerns
Marty Swant, Digiday
In September 2014, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint against Monster Energy Company, a subsidiary of Monster Beverage Corporation and the company responsible for marketing and distributing Hansen’s beverages. The complaint, which was originally filed against Monster Beverage Corporation (the holding company) in April 2014, was transferred from state court to federal court in May 2014. According to plaintiffs, the company deceptively labels several products, including Hansen’s sodas, Blue Sky sodas, Hubert’s Lemonade, Hansen’s Smoothie Nectar drinks, Hansen’s Junior Juice, and other Hansen’s Juice products. Among other things, they allege that the company:
(Marshall et al v. Monster Beverage Corporation d/b/a Hansen Beverage Company, and Does 1-50, Case No. 14-cv-06311, N. D. CA.).
Marty Swant, Digiday
Will it enforce them this time?
Lawsuit alleges beverage doesn’t meet federal standards to be marketed as rum.
TINA.org digs into company’s broad composting claims.
Unapproved drug claims abound.