Most Deceptive Ads of 2024
Here were some of the worst ads TINA.org investigated this year.
In September 2014, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint against Monster Energy Company, a subsidiary of Monster Beverage Corporation and the company responsible for marketing and distributing Hansen’s beverages. The complaint, which was originally filed against Monster Beverage Corporation (the holding company) in April 2014, was transferred from state court to federal court in May 2014. According to plaintiffs, the company deceptively labels several products, including Hansen’s sodas, Blue Sky sodas, Hubert’s Lemonade, Hansen’s Smoothie Nectar drinks, Hansen’s Junior Juice, and other Hansen’s Juice products. Among other things, they allege that the company:
(Marshall et al v. Monster Beverage Corporation d/b/a Hansen Beverage Company, and Does 1-50, Case No. 14-cv-06311, N. D. CA.).
Here were some of the worst ads TINA.org investigated this year.
Rudolph’s Fame Spells Trouble at the North Pole in This Mockumentary Ad For The Norwegian Postal Service.
Lawsuit alleges products’ ginger ale taste comes from a secret artificial ingredient.
Hidden fee is a bummer.
Some class-action settlements that left consumers behind.