There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
In September 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against E. Mishan & Sons for allegedly falsely advertising Gotham Steel cookware as “non-stick” when, according to plaintiffs, food sticks to the pans and burns. (Mack et al v. E. Mishan & Sons, Inc., Case No. 19-cv-8233, S. D. NY.)
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.