Gogo’s Recurring Charges
April 2016: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement. December 2015: A federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement of this class-action lawsuit. According to the settlement terms, class…
February 2014: The named plaintiff voluntarily dismissed his claims When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.. The reasons for the dismissal have not been disclosed.
September 2013: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Gogo LLC for allegedly misleadingly marketing the cost of in-flight Internet service. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that the company’s registration website represents customers will pay $39.95 for one month of in-flight Internet service without telling them that the charges would automatically recur on a monthly basis. (Welsh et al. v. Gogo LLC, Case No. 13-cv-6899, C. D. CA.).
April 2016: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement. December 2015: A federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement of this class-action lawsuit. According to the settlement terms, class…
A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Gogo LLC in January 2016. Among other things, the complaint alleges that the company markets passes, subscriptions and plans for in-flight Internet…
Class-action lawsuits target preservative-free claims.
This company may need to cleanse its marketing tactics.
A closer look at what we’ll be monitoring in the new year.
Looking back at our accomplishments.
How this rental car company uses subterfuge to get you to pay for something you may not need.