Gogo’s Recurring Charges
April 2016: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement. December 2015: A federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement of this class-action lawsuit. According to the settlement terms, class…
February 2014: The named plaintiff voluntarily dismissed his claims When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.. The reasons for the dismissal have not been disclosed.
September 2013: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Gogo LLC for allegedly misleadingly marketing the cost of in-flight Internet service. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that the company’s registration website represents customers will pay $39.95 for one month of in-flight Internet service without telling them that the charges would automatically recur on a monthly basis. (Welsh et al. v. Gogo LLC, Case No. 13-cv-6899, C. D. CA.).
April 2016: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement. December 2015: A federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement of this class-action lawsuit. According to the settlement terms, class…
A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Gogo LLC in January 2016. Among other things, the complaint alleges that the company markets passes, subscriptions and plans for in-flight Internet…
A Waitrose Mystery: A family Christmas takes an unexpected turn in this tale of mystery, intrigue… and pudding.
Why this eyewear company’s advertised “starting” prices may not be 20/20.
MADISON, CONN. Dec. 12, 2024— In a win for consumers, a court has ordered Quincy Bioscience to stop advertising Prevagen using memory-improvement claims. This follows a near-decade-long campaign by the…
What led up to brain supplement’s December to remember.
Jessica Bennett, The Cut