
Tesla Needs to Pull the Plug on Its Deceptive Made in USA Claims
TINA.org notifies electric vehicle maker for second time in three years.
March 2016: This action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclose. Later in March, the plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal regarding two 2013 dismissal orders and two 2015 denial of class certification.
2015: A false advertising class-action lawsuit filed against Abbott Laboratories hit a dead end when a federal judge refused to certify the class in the case twice. The complaint, which was originally filed in 2012, alleges that the company falsely promises that Ensure® Muscle Health Shakes and Ensure® Clinical Strength Drinks will “help rebuild muscle and strength naturally lost over time” when, in reality, the products do not, and cannot, provide the promised health benefits. The judge did not certify the class because the plaintiff failed to meet several requirements necessary for class certification. To read the court’s decisions and learn more, click here and here. (Otto et al v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. d/b/a Abbott Nutrition, Case No. 12-cv-1411, C. D. CA.).
TINA.org notifies electric vehicle maker for second time in three years.
Jamie L. LaReau, Detroit Free Press
Getting hangry over a hidden delivery fee.
A deceptive marketing trend takes root.
Legislators should protect the work of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.