
Energizer Max Power Bank
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing portable chargers as 10,000 mAh
Millam et al v. Energizer Holdings, Inc. et al
21-cv-1500, C.D. Cal.
(Sept. 2021)
Energizer’s AA MAX batteries
Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
Pending
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing portable chargers as 10,000 mAh
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
It’s a hot sponcon summer.
What’s this reservation good for?
TINA.org continues to support FTC, New York in federal court.
A bogus connection to major retailers is just the beginning.
Don’t pay for free online government forms.