There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Cavallaro-Kearins et al. v. Eggland’s Best, Inc. et al.
24-cv-7207, N.D. Ill.
(July 2024)
Janecyk et al. v. Eggland’s Best, Inc. et al.
24-cv-6222, N.D. Ill.
(July 2024)
Eggland’s Best Cage Free Eggs
Misleadingly marketing that eggs come from hens that are not kept in cages and are “free to roam in a pleasant, natural environment” when the hens are kept indoors with no windows and live in cramped conditions that are stressful for hens and increase their risk of disease, injury, and death
Cavallaro-Kearins case: Consolidated with the Janecyk case
Janecyk case: Pending
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
Recent ad shows what it takes to make a comeback.
New research points to “no.”