There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Chinitz et al v. Telecom Evolutions, LLC and Quality Speaks LLC
18-STCV08068, California State Court – Los Angeles
(Dec. 2018)
DSL Extreme’s trueSTREAM broadband internet services
Falsely marketing that internet service provides a fiber optic connection when it provides a copper line connection
Settled
(Preliminarily approved)
http://www.fiberopticsettlement.com/
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.