Fairlife Milk
Company’s animal welfare claims – and brand name – face increasing scrutiny.
Fehrenbach et al. v. Dreamland Baby Co.
24-cv-1112, C.D. Cal.
(May 2024)
Fehrenbach et al. v. Dreamland Baby Co.
24-cv-3406, N.D. Cal.
(June 2024)
Dream weighted sleep products
Falsely marketing products as safe, “design[ed] … according to the American Academy of Pediatrics safe sleep guidelines” and “exceed[ing] all United States Consumer Product Safety Commission Standards”
Fehrenbach case (No. 1112): Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Fehrenbach case (No. 3406): Pending
Company’s animal welfare claims – and brand name – face increasing scrutiny.
Consumers balk at hidden junk fees.
TINA.org uncovers the limits of this carrier’s “unlimited” data plans.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.