
Amazon Prime’s Free One-Day Delivery
To actually get this perk, consumers may have to pay very close attention.
In March 2014, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed her false advertising class-action lawsuit against Cosmetic Dermatology, Inc, makers of “Dr. Brandt’s Pores No More Mattifying Lotion.” The complaint, which was originally filed in 2013, alleged that, among other things, the company markets the lotion as “oil free” when it actually contains at least three oils. We do not know why the plaintiff chose to dismiss the lawsuit. The lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice, meaning the plaintiff may refile the complaint. (Tran et al v. Cosmetic Dermatology, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-09311, C.D. CA.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding the advertising of beauty products and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
To actually get this perk, consumers may have to pay very close attention.
Poking holes in this bold claim.
Lawsuit accuses retailer of greenwashing.
Site continues to mislead consumers on its ticket prices.
Asa Hiken, Adage