Coach
TINA.org investigated price advertising tactics used by outlet stores in Connecticut, including at a Coach Outlet store, and found that it ran perpetual – and therefore fabricated and deceptive –…
August 2016: This action was consolidated to be heard with three other similar lawsuits. For more information about the other cases, click on the information below.
May 2016: A false advertising class-action lawsuit against Coach was transferred from a court in California to one in New York. The complaint, which was originally filed in December 2015, alleges that Coach deceptively advertises discounts at its outlet stores by, among other things, never offering the products for sale at the represented MFSRP price and manufacturing lower-quality products exclusively for the outlet stores without ever selling the products at retail stores. (Esparza et al v. Coach, Inc. et al, Case No. 16-cv-3677, S. D. NY.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Coach and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding discounts and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
TINA.org investigated price advertising tactics used by outlet stores in Connecticut, including at a Coach Outlet store, and found that it ran perpetual – and therefore fabricated and deceptive –…
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising pricing discounts
August 2016: After being transferred to a court in New York, this action was consolidated to be heard with three other similar lawsuits. (Rael et al v. Coach, Inc. et…
August 2016: This action was consolidated to be heard with three other similar lawsuits. For more information about the other cases, click below. Esparza et al v. Coach, Inc. Marino…
TINA.org investigation reveals perpetual sales at outlet stores.