Tween Brands Stores’ Discounts
Allegations: Deceptively advertising 40% discounts when consumers are actually not getting any discounts at all because the purported discounts are ongoing
August 2017: This case was dismissed because the nationwide settlement was granted final approval. The dismissal was When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled..
November 2015: This matter was stayed pending approval of a nationwide settlement in another class-action lawsuit against the store.
June 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Tween Brands, Inc. for allegedly deceptively advertising discounts. According to the complaint, the stores advertise discounts without actually providing a discount to customers because the advertised regular prices are “fictional” and the stores always sell products at the “discounted” price. (Loor et al v. Tween Brands, Inc., Case No. 15-cv-953, M. D. FL.)
For more information about other lawsuits filed against Tween Brands, Inc. and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding the advertising of discounts and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
Allegations: Deceptively advertising 40% discounts when consumers are actually not getting any discounts at all because the purported discounts are ongoing
Allegations: Deceptively advertising discounts when consumers are actually not getting any discounts at all because the store always sells products at the “discounted” prices
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.
Permanently banned from MLM, Noland has found other ways to exploit consumers.