Discounts at Marshalls Stores
September 2015: This action was dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed. Later the same month, a Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (which consolidates this lawsuit with two others: Chester v. T.J. Maxx and Metoyer v. HomeGoods) making similar allegations was filed. The complaint alleges that TJX Companies retailers – including TJ Maxx, Marshalls, and HomeGoods – make consumers believe that prices of products are significantly discounted by comparing its prices to false higher prices. (In Re The TJX Companies, Inc., Case No. 15-cv-1437, C. D. CA.)
For more information about the status of this case, click here.
July 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Marshalls for allegedly deceptively advertising discounts by comparing a sale price to a false higher price in order to make consumers believe they are saving substantial amounts on their purchases. (Berkoff et al v. The TJX Companies, Inc., Marshalls of CA, LLC, and Does 1-100, Case No. 15-cv-1475, C. D. CA.)
For more information about the deceptive advertising of discounts and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
Thread Count of Cotton Bed Linens
Discounts at HomeGoods
The Latest
FTC Cracks Down on Forever Living Following Years of Deception
Settlement comes after TINA.org exposed thousands of deceptive income claims.
What You Should Know about Home Projectors
TINA.org sheds light on confusing and misleading brightness claims.
Under The Influence: Prediction Markets Are Harnessing Modern Joe Camels
Brant James, Ingame
Forever Living Ditching MLM Model
Company becomes the latest to leave the industry.
Fixing the Subscription Trap
The FTC’s Negative Option Rule do-over – and what’s at stake.