
Home Depot’s Damage Protection
Allegations: Misrepresenting Damage Protection as an “optional service” when the default setting in the system automatically adds the service to all rentals
Berger et al. v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
24-cv-1435, N.D. Ga.
(April 2024)
Culbertson et al. v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
24-cv-2666, N.D. Ga.
(June 2024)
Timmins et al. v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
24-cv-1141, E.D. Cal.
(April 2024)
Merchandise at Home Depot
Misleadingly advertising pricing discounts by comparing discounted prices to false reference prices
Pending
Allegations: Misrepresenting Damage Protection as an “optional service” when the default setting in the system automatically adds the service to all rentals
Allegations: Preventing consumers from giving negative reviews of Home Depot on its website and app
Allegations: Falsely marketing that lanterns are made using “clear beveled glass” when a portion of each panel is clear beveled plastic
Allegations: Failing to adequately disclose the terms of the Balance Protect add-on to Home Depot credit cards
Lawsuits take aim at so-called non-disparagement clauses.