
TINA’s Take: Supreme Court Considers Whether Liars Can Keep Money They Stole
TINA.org files brief in critical case concerning FTC authority.
In 2010, a class action was brought against Diamond Foods alleging that the company made false and misleading statements in its marketing material about the health benefits of eating walnuts. (Zeisel v. Diamond Foods, Inc., Case No. 3:10-cv-1192-JSW, N.D.Ca.)
Update: In 2012, the parties settled this lawsuit. Diamond agreed to provide $2.6 million to reimburse consumers who bought its walnuts. If you purchased Diamond of California walnuts between 2006 and 2012, you may be eligible for a refund of $3.25 or $8.25.
TINA.org files brief in critical case concerning FTC authority.
Legal battle over Michael Jackson’s posthumous album may create “dangerous” precedent.
A TINA.org scoop in 2019 sparks a class-action trend in 2020.
How Amazon steers consumers toward unproven and potentially dangerous products containing a fake vitamin called B17.
Why the MLM industry should avoid the term.