
Derma E Skincare Products
October 2018: This case was voluntarily dismissed because the parties reached a settlement agreement, the terms of which have not been disclosed.
April 2018: Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint similarly alleging that Derma E® misleadingly markets skincare products as natural when, according to plaintiffs, they actually contain synthetic, artificial, and non-natural ingredients.
October 2016: This case was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 16-cv-7735, S. D. NY.)
August 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Derma E® for allegedly misleadingly marketing its skincare products – including lotions, scrubs, and cleansers – as natural when, according to plaintiffs, they contain synthetic ingredients. (Petrosino et al v. Stearn’s Products, Inc. d/b/a Derma E®, Case No. 2016-52186, Supreme Court of New York – County of Dutchess)
Class-Action Tracker

The Latest

CATrends: Zelle Money Transfers Misleadingly Marketed as Safe and Secure
Lawsuits allege app fails to disclose lack of protections against fraud and recourse for the defrauded.

By the Numbers: Public Comments to FTC’s ANPR Regarding Earnings Claims
TINA.org’s analysis of 1500+ comments shows wide support for reining in earnings claims.

Popeyes’ Chicken Tenders: Are They Really Tenders?
TINA.org reader takes issue with Popeyes calling its breast strips “tenders.”

AutoZone Imposter Car Wrap Scam
If you see one of these scams in the rear-view mirror, floor it.

Who’s Who and Who’s Sued: Celebrities Fight Back against Fake Endorsements
Sometimes, even celebrities are surprised by what they’re selling.