Fairlife Milk
Company’s animal welfare claims – and brand name – face increasing scrutiny.
January 2015: After the lawsuit was transferred to another California court in November 2014, the parties agreed to dismiss the action. The named plaintiff’s individual claims were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. and the class members’ claims were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.. The reasons for the dismissal have not been disclosed. (Case No. 14-cv- 8641, C. D. CA.)
July 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed alleging that Beachbody, LLC deceptively advertises Fill & Freeze products. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that the company represents these products will instantly eliminate the appearance of wrinkles and promote cell renewal when, in reality, the products do not work as advertised. (Crawford et al v. Beachbody, LLC, Case No. 14-cv-1583, S. D. CA.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding anti-aging products and TINA.org’s coverage of anti-aging products, click here.
Company’s animal welfare claims – and brand name – face increasing scrutiny.
Consumers balk at hidden junk fees.
TINA.org uncovers the limits of this carrier’s “unlimited” data plans.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.