FTC cracks down on food industry for paid dietitian ‘influencer’ posts
Caitlin Gilbert, Sasha Chavkin and Anahad O’Connor, The Washington Post
December 2015: This action was voluntarily dismissed because the parties reached a settlement agreement. The terms of the agreement have not been disclosed.
May 2015: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Cricket Wireless, LLC. The complaint, which was transferred to federal court in June 2015, alleges that the company misleadingly marketed phones as “4G/LTE” (i.e., the phone would receive a 4G/LTE signal) when, in reality, the company did not have the capability to provide 4G/LTE services to a majority of customers. (Barraza et al v. Cricket Wireless, LLC, AT&T Inc., and LEAP Wireless International, Inc. and Does 1-100, Case No. 15-cv-2471, N. D. CA.)
For more information about the misleading marketing of phones and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
Caitlin Gilbert, Sasha Chavkin and Anahad O’Connor, The Washington Post
Sasha Chavkin, Caitlin Gilbert and Anahad O’Connor, The Examination
FTC investigates marketing of AI weapons scanner.
Got wood?
Following lawsuit, chain adds more detailed disclosures about caffeine content.