Lens.com
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
Smith et al v. Consumer Cellular Inc. and Target Store’s Inc.
21-cv-23, D. Mont.
(March 2021)
Consumer Cellular’s wireless service
Falsely advertising that Consumer Cellular’s cell towers and wireless service is the best and most competent as compared to several competitors
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?
Supplement maker agrees to pay $750K to settle deceptive health claims lawsuit.
Settlement comes after TINA.org exposed thousands of deceptive income claims.