Lens.com
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
Conde Nast Entertainment
January 2021: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
November 2019: This case was transferred from state court to federal court. (Case No. 19-cv-2104, S.D. Cal.)
September 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Conde Nast Entertainment for allegedly failing to tell consumers who sign up for magazine subscriptions – including Vogue and Vanity Fair – that they will be enrolled in an automatic renewal subscription program resulting in consumers being charged without their consent, in violation of California law. (Granillo et al v. Conde Nast Entertainment LLC, Case No. 37-2019-00051411, California State Court – San Diego)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of the marketing of magazine subscriptions, click here.
The Latest
On Shoes
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Junk Fees at JFK, LaGuardia and Newark Airports
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?
FTC Takes TruHeight’s Growth Claims Down a Few Pegs
Supplement maker agrees to pay $750K to settle deceptive health claims lawsuit.
FTC Cracks Down on Forever Living Following Years of Deception
Settlement comes after TINA.org exposed thousands of deceptive income claims.