
“COMPARE AT” Prices at T.J. Maxx Stores
In July 2018, a class-action lawsuit was filed against T.J. Maxx stores for allegedly deceptively advertising “phantom markdown[s]” on merchandise by comparing a higher, fictional “COMPARE AT” price to the lower sale price. According to the plaintiffs, the store uses the “COMPARE AT” prices to mislead consumers into believing they are purchasing merchandise at a discount and that the merchandise is of a higher quality than it actually is. (Fuentes et al v. TJX Companies, Inc. d/b/a T.J. Maxx stores, Case No. 18-cv-22767, S.D. Fla.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of fictitious pricing, click here.
Class-Action Tracker


“Deep Discounts” at T.J. Maxx Stores

Discounts at T.J. Maxx

Thread Counts of Linens at T. J. Maxx

Thread Count of Cotton Bed Linens

Discounts at Marshalls Stores

Discounts at HomeGoods
The Latest

FTC’s Negative Option Rule Needs Improvement
TINA.org applauds proposed amendments but pushes for more.

CATrends: Deceptive Tactics Used to Market Subscriptions
Lawsuits allege companies fail to make adequate disclosures.

MoviePass: ‘Get a Month Free’
The movie ticket subscription service is back. Unfortunately, so too are the deceptive ads.

FTC Launches Investigation into IML’s Business Opportunity
Agency seeks documents from former instructor and salesperson.

TINA.org to FTC: Deceptive Recyclable Claims Belong in the Trash
Recyclable claims for products that aren’t actually being recycled need to stop.