Clearly Natural Essentials Hand Soaps
Allegations: False natural claims
April 2018: This case was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled. because the parties reached a settlement agreement. The terms of the agreement have not been disclosed.
August 2017: An amended complaint alleging that Clearly Natural Essentials falsely markets products as natural when they contain artificial and synthetic ingredients was filed.
March 2017: Some of the claims – including ones for breach of warranty, unjust enrichment, and negligent misrepresentation – were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed. Other claims – including state false advertising claims – remain pending.
October 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Clearly Natural Essentials for allegedly falsely advertising its products – including Pure and Natural Tea Tree Glycerine Soap, Pure and Natural Lemon Glycerine Hand Soap, and Pure and Natural Glycerine Body Lotion – as “Clearly Natural” and “Pure and Natural” when they actually contain artificial and synthetic ingredients. (Ciancio et al v. Beaumont Products Inc. d/b/a Clearly Natural Essentials, Case No. 16-cv-8124, S.D.N.Y.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding natural claims and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
Allegations: False natural claims
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.
Company walks back composting claim following TINA.org inquiry sparked by self-regulatory ad challenge.
Why the price you see may not be the price you get.
New AI-powered search feature produces misleading answers.
Eyewear company makes marketing changes following FTC inquiry.