
Clarin’s Vital Light Collection and Body Lift Collection
July 2016: A federal judge dismissed this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction after refusing to certify the class finding that certain requirements for class certification were not met.
April 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Clarins for allegedly deceptively marketing beauty-enhancing creams in the Vital Light Collection and the Body Lift Collection. Among other things, the complaint alleges that the company promises its creams will restore “the deep luminosity of young-looking skin” and fight cellulite when, in reality, the creams cannot provide the promised results. (Garcia et al v. Clarins USA, Inc., Clarins Inc., Clarins North America, Inc., Clarins Group North America, Inc., Clarins SA, Clarins Paris, Case No. 14-cv-21249, S. D. FL.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding anti-aging products and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
Class-Action Tracker

The Latest

What You Should Know about Elomir
What you need to know before you #hitthestrip.

Roblox Quietly Removes Its Ban on Ads Directed at Kids
What’s stopping advertisers from targeting children now?

Bespoke Apothecary
Products marketed to treat COVID are pulled in wake of FDA/FTC warning letter.

TINA.org Notifies Automakers Deceptively Marketing Made in USA Vehicles
MADISON, CONN. November 7, 2022 – No Super Bowl is complete without at least one car commercial teeming with red, white and blue flags and blatant nods to Americana with…

$3 Million Verdict Should Give Deceptive Made in USA Marketers Pause
Jury puts a dollar value on a competitor’s false U.S.-origin claims.