Chicco Car Seats
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals
Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Case Name (Date)
Jimenez et al v. Artsana USA, Inc.
21-cv-7933, S.D.N.Y.
(Sept. 2021)
Product/Service
Chicco KitFit booster seats
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds when the seats are not safe for children who weigh less than 40 pounds
Misleadingly marketing that the booster seats provide protection in side-impact collisions when they don’t
Status
Settled
(Preliminarily approved)
https://www.artsanaboosterseatsettlement.com/
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
The Latest
Hekma Center
Did this supplement company really create a cure for Herpes?
Quinnipiac University: ‘#1 University for Getting a Job’
How is #1 defined?
Decoding Cosmetics Claims: Blue Light-Blocking Skincare
Why these products may leave you feeling blue.
UFC Fight Pass
UFC’s advertising may make you tap out of this streaming service.
Top Dog Pet Store
TINA.org finds that this pet company’s health claims are all bark and no bite.