Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Car Seats
Case Name (Date)
Seidl et al. v. Chicco USA, Inc.
22-cv-2586, E.D. Penn.
(July 2022)
Product/Service
Certain Chicco car seats
Allegations
Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals, such as flame retardants and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which have been linked to several health issues
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
The Latest
Jess Stewart (aka Micro Bakery Girl)
Will you really make thousands of dollars a month as a home baker?
Factor: 50% Off Your First Box
Unboxing this meal kit company’s enticing offer.
Perimenopause is the new buzzword in the business of women’s health
Sarah Todd, Stat News
Will Walmart Ever Take Responsibility for Deception on Its Site?
TINA.org finds more of the same – and then some – from retail giant.
Amazon to Pay $2.5 Billion to Settle Trickery Charges Related to Prime
FTC lawsuit alleged company duped consumers into signing up and then made it hard to cancel.