Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Booster Seats
Case Name (Date)
Sayers et al v. Artsana USA, Inc.
21-cv-1876, E.D. Penn.
(April 2021)
Product/Service
Chicco booster seats, including KidFit, KidFit Zip Plus, KidFit Zip Air Plus, and KidFit Adapt Plus
Allegations
Falsely advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds when the seats are not safe for children who weigh less than 40 pounds
Misleadingly marketing that booster seats have been side-impact tested and provide protection in side-impact collisions when testing does not show that the seats are safe in side-impact collisions and the seats do not appreciably reduce the risk of serious injury
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Car Seats
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals
The Latest
Top Dog Pet Store
TINA.org finds that this pet company’s health claims are all bark and no bite.
Rapid Radios
Does this walkie-talkie actually work from anywhere?
NA-KD Fashion
Not all free shipping claims are cut from the same cloth.
BullyKamp
FDA warns that this pet company’s marketing bites off more than it can chew.
CFPB Proposes Paycheck Advance Rule
TINA.org joins coalition of consumer organizations in support of the proposed rule