ChapStick Natural Claims
Allegations: False natural claims
Jolly et al. v. GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Holdings (US) LLC and Pfizer Inc.
22-cv-5555, S.D.N.Y.
(June 2022)
ChapStick products
False natural claims
Pending
Allegations: False natural claims
December 2018: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed. September 2016: A class-action…
In May 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Wyeth Consumer Healthcare for allegedly misleadingly marketing – on the front of the package — that its Chapstick lip balm-sunscreen products…
Is Big Pharma marketing a drug to help aging men with low sex drives or really selling a made-up disease?
GSK will pay out $105 million in off-label use case.
Justice Department says company put profits over safety.
Pfizer overstated the benefits and efficiency of a popular antibiotic in a direct-to-consumer advertising campaign.
Oregon requiring Pfizer to get ads approved by FDA because of violations.