Lens.com
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
Allen et al. v. Audiophile Music Direct Inc. d/b/a Music Direct and Mobile Fidelity Sound Lab, Inc.
22-cv-8146, C.D. Cal.
(Sept. 2022)
Bitterman et al. v. Mobile Fidelity Sound Lab, Inc. and Audiophile Music Direct, Inc.
22-cv-4714, N.D. Ill.
(Sept. 2022)
Molinari et al. v. Audiophile Music Direct, Inc. and Mobile Fidelity Sound Lab, Inc.
22-cv-5444, N.D. Cal.
(Sept. 2022)
Stiles et al. v. Mobile Fidelity Sound Lab, Inc.
22-cv-4405, N.D. Ill.
(Aug. 2022)
Vinyl records labeled as “Original Master Recording” and records that are part of the “Ultradisc One Step” series
Falsely marketing that recordings are from the original or master recording when the files have undergone a digital mastering process
Pending
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?
Supplement maker agrees to pay $750K to settle deceptive health claims lawsuit.
Settlement comes after TINA.org exposed thousands of deceptive income claims.