
Pencils Down: Princeton Review Revises Marketing following TINA.org Investigation
SAT test prep company comes clean about its money-back guarantee.
Stewart et al. v. Acer Inc. et al.
22-cv-4684, N.D. Cal.
(Aug. 2022)
Acer computers with AMD Ryzen or Athlon processors with firmware TPM modules
Misleadingly marketing computers as suitable for watching videos, videoconferencing and gaming when a design defect causes stuttering in audio and video
Misleadingly marketing that computers provide “robust,” “multi-layered” security when they are vulnerable to firmware attacks due to a defect
Pending
SAT test prep company comes clean about its money-back guarantee.
Illegal claims that company’s products prevent hair loss also need to go.
MADISON, CONN. December 1, 2022 – Acting on a complaint filed by ad watchdog, truthinadvertising.org (TINA.org), California regulators have reached a settlement with lingerie company Savage X Fenty, originally a joint venture between…
Complaints allege violations of state securities laws.
Lingerie company agrees to pay $1.2 million to settle lawsuit