There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
In April 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Brookdale Senior Living for allegedly misleadingly representing that it bases staffing decisions at assisted living facilities on its Resident Assessment program that identifies specifics about each resident’s level of care when, according to plaintiffs, staffing decisions are based on labor budgets and profit goals determined at the corporate level. (Runton et al v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc., Case No. 17-cv-60664, S. D. FL.)
For more information about class-action lawsuits regarding seniors and TINA.org’s coverage of them, click here.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.