Boxes of Junior Mints® and Sugar Babies®
Allegations: Deceptively using slack-filled packaging for candies
October 2018: The appeal was withdrawn.
August 2018: A federal judge dismissed this case concluding that the packaging would not mislead reasonable consumers. To read the full court decision, click here. Later in August, the named plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the decision to dismiss the case.
October 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Tootsie Roll Industries for allegedly deceptively using You know when you buy a big bag of chips, and you’re all psyched for a feast, and then it turns out there are like, three chips in the bag? That bag is slack filled.ed boxes for Junior Mints® candy to make it appear that consumers are receiving more candy than they actually are. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the amount of empty space in boxes ranges from 35% to 43%. (Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in January 2018.) (Daniel et al v. Tootsie Roll Industries, LLC, Case No. 17-cv-7541, S.D.N.Y.)
For more information about slack-filled packaging, click here.
Allegations: Deceptively using slack-filled packaging for candies
Allegations: Deceptively using slack-filled packaging
Allegations: Deceptively using slack-filled boxes for Junior Mints and Sugar Babies
There are other types of candy to enjoy at the movies, right?
What was up with all that named candy at the 2017 Oscars?