Milk Bone Dipped Dog Biscuits
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as containing no artificial preservatives when they contain the preservative citric acid
In July 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Big Heart Pet Brands for allegedly falsely marketing pet food as natural when, according to plaintiffs, the pet food contains artificial and synthetic ingredients. (Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in March 2018.) (van Mourik et al v. Big Heart Pet Brands Inc., Case No. 17-cv-3889, N.D. Cal.)
For more information about the marketing of pet products and TINA.org’s coverage of them, click here.
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as containing no artificial preservatives when they contain the preservative citric acid
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as containing “Real Beef” when they are made using low quality feed grade beef
Eric Lagatta, USA Today
Following a complaint by ad watchdog truthinadvertising.org (TINA.org), Pottery Barn’s parent company Williams-Sonoma has agreed to pay more than $3 million for violating a 2020 FTC consent order requiring that…
FTC says civil penalty against Williams-Sonoma is “the largest ever in a Made in USA case.”
The NBA superstar isn’t just cashing endorsement checks.
Lawsuit alleges environmental claims don’t stick.