The FTC is not anti-direct selling. It’s pro-truth in advertising.
The DSA misses the mark.
A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against BevMo! for allegedly engaging in a bait and switch scheme by advertising certain wines as having high ratings when, in reality, the wines being sold are from different vintages and therefore do not have the same rating as those advertised. (Liang et al v. Bevmo!, Case No. BC567785, Superior Court of California – County of Los Angeles)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against BevMo! and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
For more information about the advertising of alcohol and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
The DSA misses the mark.
TINA.org reader takes issue with this product’s deceptive packaging.
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?