Barlean’s Coconut Oil
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as healthy
Barlean’s Omega Twin
October 2014: A federal judge sent this lawsuit back to state court finding that the federal court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.
June 2014: A class-action lawsuit filed against Barlean’s Organic Oils over its marketing of “Barlean’s Omega Twin” was transferred from state court to federal court. The complaint, which was originally filed in May 2014, alleges that the company intentionally misrepresents that Barlean’s Omega Twin, a dietary supplement, contains both borage oil and gamma-linolelic acid (GLA) when the supplement actually does not contain either ingredient. (Hoffman et al v. Barlean’s Organic Oils, LLC., Case No. 14-cv-03770, D. N.J.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits against supplements and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
Barlean’s Greens Supplement Powder
In July 2018, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Barlean’s Organic Oils for allegedly falsely advertising Barlean’s Greens supplement powder as a “Vegan Superfood” that will provide various health benefits…
Barlean’s Greens Supplement Powders
In May 2018, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Barlean’s for allegedly deceptively advertising its Greens Supplement Powders. The complaint claims that the company misleadingly advertises the product as a…
The Latest
We Play Different | The North Face
Mother Nature doesn’t play games, and neither does The North Face
NA-KD Fashion
Not all free shipping claims are cut from the same cloth.
BullyKamp
FDA warns that this pet company’s marketing bites off more than it can chew.
CFPB Proposes Paycheck Advance Rule
TINA.org joins coalition of consumer organizations in support of the proposed rule
ARMRA Colostrum Supplements
Company distances itself from touted “studies” while continuing to use deceptive health claims.