Babyganics SPF 50+ Sunscreens
December 2017: This case was stayed pending a nationwide settlement in a related case, Mayhew v. KAS Direct and S. C. Johnson & Son.
October 2017: The claims against VMG Partners were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed. The claims against S. C. Johnson & Son remain pending.
August 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against S. C. Johnson & Son and VMG Partners for allegedly falsely advertising babyganics mineral-based sunscreens as being SPF 50+ when, according to plaintiffs, the SPF of the sunscreens is no more than, and sometimes much lower than, SPF 30. (Carroll et al v. S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. and VMG Partners, LLC, Case No. 17-cv-5828, N.D. Ill.)
For more information about TINA.org’s coverage of the marketing of sunscreens, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
Babyganics Bath Products
Babyganics Pre-Moistened Wipes
The Latest
Jess Stewart (aka Micro Bakery Girl)
Will you really make thousands of dollars a month as a home baker?
Factor: 50% Off Your First Box
Unboxing this meal kit company’s enticing offer.
Perimenopause is the new buzzword in the business of women’s health
Sarah Todd, Stat News
Will Walmart Ever Take Responsibility for Deception on Its Site?
TINA.org finds more of the same – and then some – from retail giant.
Amazon to Pay $2.5 Billion to Settle Trickery Charges Related to Prime
FTC lawsuit alleged company duped consumers into signing up and then made it hard to cancel.