Vunella Naturals’ Mother’s Day Sale
This isn’t the mother of a deal it might appear to be.
In November 2013, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Atlas Roofing Corporation alleging that its Atlas Chalet Shingles did not perform as represented in the product’s various marketing materials (including brochures and product labels). Specifically, the complaint alleges that the company advertises that the roofing shingles meet applicable building codes and industry standards when, in reality, they do not. In addition, plaintiffs claim the company represents that the shingles would last 30 years when, in reality, the shingles are defective causing them to blister and crack before 30 years have passed. (Brooks et al v. Atlas Roofing Corp., Case No. 13-cv-00187, S. D. MS.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding shingles and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
This isn’t the mother of a deal it might appear to be.
While these ads can be appreciated by all, they may strike a chord with ad lawyers.
The latest chapter in our Fast-Food Chicken Diaries.
TINA.org digs into MLM coach’s marketing pitch.
Proposed rule seeks to address consumer confusion about U.S.-origin claims for meat.