Fixing the Subscription Trap
The FTC’s Negative Option Rule do-over – and what’s at stake.
Brown et al. v. Ascension Health
24-cv-724, E.D. Mo.
(May 2024)
Croft et al. v. Ascension Health
24-cv-870, E.D. Mo.
(June 2024)
Hoskins et al. v. Ascension Health
24-cv-964, E.D. Mo.
(July 2024)
Juracek et al. v. Ascension Health
24-cv-905, E.D. Mo.
(July 2024)
L.S. et al. v. Ascension Health
24-cv-693, E.D. Mo.
(May 2024)
McClellan et al. v. Ascension Health
24-cv-686, E.D. Mo.
(May 2024)
Negron et al. v. Ascension Health
24-cv-3857, N.D. Ill.
(May 2024)
Shuta et al. v. Ascension Health
24-cv-683, E.D. Mo.
(May 2024)
Willis et al. v. Ascension Health
24-cv-821, E.D. Mo.
(June 2024)
Ascension Health
Misrepresenting that it protects consumers’ personal information when it failed to do so and there was a data breach in May 2024
Pending
The FTC’s Negative Option Rule do-over – and what’s at stake.
Be wary of questionable and deceptive claims in origin stories.
Mounting lawsuits accuse Meta of breaking privacy promises.
Breaking down the fine print of this March Madness commercial.
Advertised $19.99 price deserves an official review.