
CATrends: Packed in ‘100% Fruit Juice’
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
Moses et al. v Arhaus, Inc.
24-cv-728, C.D. Cal.
(April 2024)
Furniture, home décor, and other products from Arhaus
Falsely advertising discounts off of artificially inflated reference prices
Pending
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.
Be wary of these life-changing claims.
TINA.org reader receives a suspicious email.