Planned Parenthood’s Reported Use of ‘Marketing Trackers’
Organization reportedly shared information with tech companies for marketing purposes.
Ancestry.com
September 2020: The case was dismissed after the Court granted a motion to compel arbitration.
July 2020: This case was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 20-cv-1456, S.D. Cal.)
June 2020: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Ancestry.com alleging that it misleadingly offers a free trial to access genealogical records without adequately disclosing that consumers who sign up for the free trial will be automatically enrolled in a monthly subscription resulting in consumers being charged without their consent. (Chapple et al v. Ancestry.com Operations Inc., Case No. 37-2020-00021807, California State Court – San Diego)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of negative option offers, click here.
The Latest
Gamer Advantage’s Blue-Light Glasses
Are these gaming glasses really ‘clinically proven’ to improve sleep?
TINA.org Notifies Celebrities Promoting NFTs
MADISON, CONN. August 9, 2022 — An increasing number of celebrities are jumping on the NFT bandwagon, showcasing their digital assets on social media for the world to see. But are…
17 Celebrities Just Got Warning Letters About Shilling NFTs
Katie Notopoulos, BuzzFeed News
TINA.org Sends Notification Letters to Celebrities Promoting NFTs
What’s behind these ubiquitous social media posts?