Aveeno Makeup Removing Wipes
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as 100% plant-based when they contain synthetic, non-plant ingredients
September 2014: Plaintiffs withdrew their motion to transfer and consolidate related lawsuits.
June 2014: Plaintiffs moved to transfer (i. e. move a case to another court) and consolidate (i. e. hear several proceedings together) related lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson. According to the complaints, the company misleadingly markets “Active Naturals” Aveeno products by marketing and labeling the products as “natural” when they actually contain synthetic ingredients. (In Re: Johnson & Johnson Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, MDL No. 2565, U. S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as 100% plant-based when they contain synthetic, non-plant ingredients
Allegations: Failing to disclose products contain the carcinogen benzene
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as specially made for babies when they contain the same formulation as the adult versions
Allegations: Failing to disclose sunscreens contain the carcinogen benzene
Lawsuits claim infant-specific products aren’t any different than acetaminophen medications for older children.
NAD inquiry finds supporting evidence lacking.
The dirt on beauty and personal care products marketed as “clean.”
These claims are tough to swallow.
Be wary of claims to restore or rebuild tooth enamel as once it is lost, it is gone forever.