There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Heilman et al. v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
26-cv-2224, N.D. Cal.
(March 2026)
Abercrombie & Fitch and Hollister merchandise
Failing to include a mandatory handling fee in advertised prices
Pending
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.