BullyKamp
FDA warns that this pet company’s marketing bites off more than it can chew.
November 2017: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement.
May 2017: A federal judge preliminarily approved the settlement agreement. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for September 14, 2017. For more information, go to https://www.wildplanetsettlement.com/Home.aspx. (Soto v. Wild Planet Foods, Inc., Case No. 15-cv-5082, N. D. CA.)
February 2017: The parties moved for preliminary approval of a settlement that resolves two lawsuits against Wild Planet Foods: Shihad et al v. Wild Planet Foods, Inc. and Soto et al v. Wild Planet Foods, Inc. (Case No. 15-cv-5082, N. D. CA.).
According to the proposed settlement terms, class members may receive $29 (cash payments may be reduced on a pro-rata basis if the cash available in the settlement fund does not satisfy all of the class members’ claims). The settlement agreement does not provide any injunctive relief.
May 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Wild Planet Foods, Inc. for allegedly underfilling 5-ounce cans of Wild Planet Tuna, in violation of federal standards. (Shihad et al v. Wild Planet Foods, Inc. and Does 1-25, Case No. 16-cv-1478, N.D. Cal.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding tuna and TINA.org’s coverage of the product, click here.
FDA warns that this pet company’s marketing bites off more than it can chew.
TINA.org joins coalition of consumer organizations in support of the proposed rule
Company distances itself from touted “studies” while continuing to use deceptive health claims.
Can you earn a salary just by placing a small sticker on your car?
Lawsuits accuse companies of using deceptive claims to reel in consumers.